The 360-Degree Leader: Mastering the Art of Leading Up, Down, and Sideways

Long before I earned the title, rank, and paycheck of a foreman, I discovered a truth that most people never learn about leadership:

Real leaders don't wait for permission to lead.

They don't need titles to create influence.

In fact, the most challenging and revealing test of true leadership happens not when you're managing down to your direct reports, but when you're influencing up to your supervisors and sideways to your peers.

I had to learn to lead "up"—to influence and help my supervisors become better leaders, make good decisions, and avoid or step back from bad decisions.

This skill of 360-degree leadership separates true leaders from mere position holders. It's the difference between wielding authority and exercising influence.

The Authority Illusion: Why Titles Don't Make Leaders

What most people get wrong about leadership is they think the title/rank makes you a leader, and that's why their leadership fails—they base it on authority and not actual influence.

This fundamental misunderstanding creates what I call "positional leaders"—people who can only function when they have formal power over others.

They confuse compliance with commitment, fear with respect, and hierarchy with leadership.

The Authority Trap

Positional leaders fall into several predictable traps:

• Over-reliance on Command: They default to "because I said so" when challenged
• Influence Impotence: They struggle to persuade anyone outside their direct authority
• Upward Powerlessness: They feel helpless when dealing with superiors or organizational politics
• Lateral Friction: They can't collaborate effectively with peers who don't report to them
• Legacy Limitation: Their impact disappears when they leave their position

The Influence Reality

True leadership is fundamentally about influence—the ability to affect change through relationship, credibility, and value creation rather than formal power.

Influence works regardless of organizational hierarchy because it's based on what you contribute, not what position you hold.

Real leaders create value for others, which creates natural influence that flows in all directions—up, down, and sideways.

Leading Up: The Most Challenging Direction

Leading up is perhaps the most sophisticated leadership skill because it requires influencing people who have formal power over you.

This demands exceptional emotional intelligence, strategic thinking, and relationship management.

The Foreman's Apprenticeship

My education in upward leadership began years before I had any formal authority.

As a journeyman electrician, I noticed that some supervisors consistently made better decisions than others, and it wasn't always because they were smarter or more experienced.

Often, it was because they had better information and different perspectives feeding into their decision-making process.

I realized that I could be a source of that better information and those different perspectives.

The First Time I Remember Leading Up

This came to the test when I was working for a newly-promoted superintendent. He would constantly hover on the jobsite making sure we were making him look good.

And like most new supervisors, he was big on micromanagement and low on trust.

In his desire to be help the project along, he made a decision that once implemented would make the work and maintenance of the project much more difficult for the guys.

Knowing he was new, I knew it wouldn't help to point out the folly of his decision so I decided to try a different approach and asked him a few questions to get into his mindset and to understand why he wanted it done in this way.

In the process, I better understood his "commander's intent" but he also realized some things because of the questions.

In the process, he made some adjustments to his earlier edicts, making everybody happy.

The Value-First Approach

The foundation of leading up is simple:

Make your supervisor more successful.

This isn't about brown-nosing or manipulation—it's about genuinely contributing to their effectiveness and the organization's success.

Practical strategies for leading up:

• Information Intelligence: Be the person who brings valuable information before it becomes a problem
• Solution Orientation: Don't just bring problems—bring problems with potential solutions
• Resource Awareness: Help your supervisor understand what resources are actually needed on the ground
• Trend Recognition: Share patterns you're seeing that might affect future decisions
• Risk Mitigation: Alert them to potential issues before they become crises
• Opportunity Identification: Point out possibilities they might not see from their position

The Influence Framework for Upward Leadership

1. Build Credibility First

• Consistently deliver on your commitments
• Demonstrate competence in your core responsibilities
• Develop expertise that adds value beyond your job description
• Show you can be trusted with sensitive information

2. Understand Their Pressures

• Learn what metrics they're measured on
• Understand the pressures they face from their superiors
• Recognize the constraints and limitations they work within
• Appreciate the broader organizational context they navigate

3. Communicate Strategically

• Frame suggestions in terms of their goals and priorities
• Use their language and communication style
• Choose the right timing and setting for important conversations
• Present options rather than demands

4. Build Alliances

• Develop relationships with other influential people in the organization
• Create coalitions around good ideas
• Use informal networks to amplify your influence
• Find champions who can support your initiatives

Leading Sideways: The Collaboration Challenge

Leading peers requires a different set of skills because you have no formal authority over them, yet you need their cooperation to achieve larger organizational goals.

This is pure influence—no hierarchy to fall back on.

The Peer Dynamic

Your peers have their own priorities, pressures, and performance metrics.

They're not inherently motivated to help you succeed, and they may even see you as competition.

Leading sideways requires creating mutual value and finding ways to align interests.

Strategies for Lateral Leadership

• Reciprocity Building: Create a bank of favors by helping others before you need their help
• Resource Sharing: Offer your resources, expertise, or connections to solve their problems
• Information Exchange: Become a valuable source and recipient of useful information
• Joint Problem-Solving: Collaborate on challenges that affect multiple departments or teams
• Mutual Recognition: Publicly acknowledge and celebrate their contributions
• Conflict Navigation: Help resolve disputes between other parties

The Network Effect

Successful lateral leaders understand that organizations are networks of relationships, not just hierarchical structures.

They invest time in building and maintaining these relationships because they understand that most important work gets done through informal influence rather than formal authority.

The True Leadership Assessment

If you're thinking about being a leader, or maybe you already are, then you need to assess your ability based on how you can influence people who are not your direct reports because they "have to," but other people.

This reframes leadership assessment completely. Instead of measuring leadership by how well your subordinates perform (which could be due to fear, compliance, or their own competence), you measure it by your influence with people who have a choice about whether to follow you.

The Influence Metrics

These are some of the real metrics of your leadership, not just how well your team is doing:

How often do people come to you to ask your opinion/advice/experience?

This metric reveals whether people see you as a valuable resource.

If people aren't seeking your input, it suggests they don't perceive you as having valuable insights or they don't trust you enough to be vulnerable by asking for help.

Frequency Indicators:

• Daily questions from various people = High influence
• Weekly consultations from a core group = Moderate influence
• Occasional requests from close colleagues = Limited influence
• Rare or no requests = No perceived value

When you give people your insights, how often do they take action on it?

This measures the quality and credibility of your influence.

People might ask your opinion to be polite, but they only act on it if they truly value your judgment.

Action Rates:

• 80%+ implementation = Trusted advisor level influence
• 60-80% implementation = Strong influence
• 40-60% implementation = Moderate influence
• Under 40% implementation = Weak influence

How diverse is the group of people who seek you out?

This reveals the breadth and transferability of your influence.

If only people like you or in your immediate work area seek your input, your influence might be limited by similarity bias.

Diversity Indicators:

• Different departments, levels, backgrounds, and perspectives = Broad influence
• Multiple departments but similar levels = Moderate breadth
• Same department, different levels = Limited scope
• Only peers in your immediate area = Narrow influence

Additional Leadership Metrics

Beyond these core questions, consider these additional indicators:

• Problem-Solving Requests: Do people bring you their difficult challenges?
• Conflict Mediation: Do people ask you to help resolve disputes?
• Decision Consultation: Do people run important decisions by you before acting?
• Introduction Requests: Do people ask you to connect them with others in your network?
• Learning Opportunities: Do people invite you to share your expertise or experience?

The Construction Site Laboratory

The construction industry provides an excellent setting for observing 360-degree leadership because projects require constant coordination between different trades, supervisors, and management levels.

Success depends on influence networks, not just formal authority.

The Journeyman Influencer

I watched one journeyman electrician who had more real influence than most foremen.

He never had formal authority over anyone, but:

• Leading Up: Supervisors regularly consulted him on complex installations and scheduling decisions
• Leading Sideways: Other trades coordinated with him on timing and logistics because he always helped them solve problems
• Leading Down: Apprentices and junior journeymen sought his mentorship even though he wasn't their assigned supervisor

His influence came from consistently adding value:

He solved problems before they became crises, shared information that helped others succeed, and always delivered on his commitments.

The Formal Authority Failure

Conversely, I worked under foremen who had all the formal authority but little real influence.

Their teams complied but didn't commit.

Other supervisors avoided collaborating with them.

Upper management made decisions without their input.

Despite their titles, they were leadership failures because they never developed influence beyond their formal position.

Developing 360-Degree Leadership Skills

Building the ability to lead in all directions requires intentional development across several key areas:

Emotional Intelligence Mastery

• Self-Awareness: Understanding your own triggers, strengths, and limitations
• Self-Regulation: Managing your emotions and reactions in challenging situations
• Social Awareness: Reading the emotions and motivations of others accurately
• Relationship Management: Building and maintaining positive relationships across all levels

Communication Excellence

• Adaptability: Adjusting your communication style to match your audience
• Clarity: Expressing ideas clearly and persuasively
• Listening: Truly hearing and understanding others' perspectives
• Feedback: Giving and receiving feedback effectively

Strategic Thinking

• Systems Perspective: Understanding how different parts of the organization interact
• Long-term Vision: Seeing beyond immediate tasks to broader goals and implications
• Pattern Recognition: Identifying trends and connections others might miss
• Scenario Planning: Anticipating potential outcomes and preparing accordingly

Value Creation

• Problem-Solving: Consistently finding solutions to difficult challenges
• Innovation: Bringing new ideas and improvements to existing processes
• Resource Development: Helping others grow and develop their capabilities
• Network Building: Creating connections that benefit the broader organization

The Compound Effect of Multi-Directional Influence

When you develop the ability to lead up, down, and sideways, these influences compound and amplify each other:

Upward Influence Benefits

• Better resources and support for your team
• Greater organizational visibility and opportunities
• Reduced bureaucratic obstacles
• Enhanced credibility with peers and subordinates

Lateral Influence Benefits

• Smoother cross-functional collaboration
• Access to broader networks and resources
• Enhanced problem-solving capabilities through diverse perspectives
• Reduced organizational politics and friction

Downward Influence Benefits

• Higher team performance and engagement
• Better talent retention and development
• Increased innovation and initiative
• Stronger succession planning and legacy building

The Leadership Paradox: Influence Before Authority

The ultimate paradox of leadership is that the best way to gain authority is to first develop influence, but many people wait for authority before trying to develop influence.

The Influence-First Path

1. Start where you are with whatever position you currently hold
2. Focus on adding value to everyone around you—superiors, peers, and juniors
3. Build relationships based on mutual benefit and respect
4. Develop expertise that others find valuable and want to access
5. Practice influence skills in low-risk situations before high-stakes moments
6. Earn trust through consistent delivery and reliable character
7. Expand your network by connecting and helping others connect

The Authority-First Trap

People who wait for formal authority before developing influence often find that:

• The authority comes with more responsibility than they're prepared for
• They lack the relationship foundation necessary for effective leadership
• Their influence is limited to their formal role and disappears when they leave
• They struggle with the complex stakeholder management required in senior positions

Putting It On the Mat: The True Test of Leadership

The ability to lead up, down, and sideways represents the true test of leadership because it requires pure influence—no formal authority to fall back on, no positional power to leverage, just the ability to create value for others and inspire them to action.

Real leadership is not about the title on your business card or the size of your team—it's about the breadth and depth of your positive influence across all levels of an organization.

When people seek your advice regardless of your position, when they act on your suggestions even when they don't have to, when a diverse group of people see you as a valuable resource—that's when you know you've developed true leadership capability.

The question isn't whether you have the title of leader.

The question is whether you have the influence of one.

And that influence, once developed, works in every direction—up the hierarchy to those with more formal power, across to those with equal standing, and down to those who look to you for guidance.

Master 360-degree leadership, and you don't just become a better leader—you become the kind of leader that organizations can't afford to lose and people genuinely want to follow.

​